Thanks to you both Melissa and Nikki for the reassurance here. I’m new to the licensing side of things so I’m a little unsure what’s standard and what’s not.

 

In talking with the publisher, their explanation lined up with yours, that they wouldn’t know what a fee might be until it happened, and that no one has really asked. They also elaborated that they participate in Portico and CLOCKSS, which would have reassured me had it been included from the start in the license.

 

Thanks,

Andrew

 

From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Nikki DeMoville
Sent: March 9, 2018 1:59 PM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] permanent back issue license question

 

I'm inclined to agree with Melissa's interpretation.  You could ask the publisher to clarify how much they think the fee would be, but I suspect they have left it deliberately vague since the chosen medium and its associated cost would change along with the available technology.  This clause seems to be pretty standard boilerplate and I've seen it frequently, but have not had occasion to trigger it.

I have a related question regarding the Gale/Cengage archive copies that Melissa mentions.  If anyone has an established workflow for these, would you be willing to share?  They are only available to download for a limited time--do you download and store them somewhere as part of your acquisitions/ERM workflow?  How do you curate those local files?  While I appreciate Gale's gesture, I feel like this just opens up a lot of questions related to local hosting, accessibility, and digital preservation.  Gale recently announced that they were going to take down several reference titles as part of their GVRL/GDL upgrade, and we actually decided it just wasn't worth it to deal with the headaches for what was essentially content we would have weeded from our print reference area as part of normal limited retention policies.

--
Nikki DeMoville
Coordinator - Electronic Resources, Acquisitions, and Resource Sharing
Robert E. Kennedy Library
California Polytechnic State University
San Luis Obispo, California

Direct 805-756-5780
Fax 805-756-7711
ndemovil@calpoly.edu

On 3/9/2018 7:15 AM, Melissa Belvadi wrote:

I think "cost-based fee" is there way of saying the fee won't attempt to make them a profit, that it will be based on their costs of providing the content in that archival format to you for you to keep in-house. That's different from having access lightened up on a dark archive like Portico, which is only available if the publisher doesn't offer hosting anymore (eg goes bankrupt).

If that publisher also participates in Portico/LOCKSS, then this contract clause is just giving you another worst-case option of self-hosting for a one-time fee for their costs of transferring the data to you.

 

At least that's how I interpret it. Anyone else disagree?

 

I would at this point like to give a "plug" for my favorite publisher/vendor on this topic, Gale/Cengage, who immediately provide for free self-hosting copies of their reference ebooks that you purchase, in addition to them hosting it for a reasonable hosting fee. Even though we've never needed to do that, and would not look forward to figuring out how to self-host reference books well, I really appreciate that we have the option already built into our purchases with them and don't need to wait for worst-case to happen to get our own backup copies. I wish every ebook publisher did this. I know, that's books, not journals.

 


Melissa Belvadi

Collections Librarian

University of Prince Edward Island

mbelvadi@upei.ca 902-566-0581

 

 

 

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 4:55 PM, Andrew Kelly <akelly@paulsmiths.edu> wrote:

Hi All,

We’re considering the permanent purchase of a set of journal back issues from a professional society, in lieu of a recently increased subscription.

 

The publisher’s license includes this line about archiving “[publisher], in its discretion, will either continue online access to the same material on [publisher]’s server or provide an archival copy in the electronic medium selected by [publisher], at a reasonable cost-based fee.”

 

I recognize that other publishers will often have archival access at no additional cost through LOCKSS or Portico etc, and this appears to require an additional fee.

So far, this particular publisher seems likely to have a different view on what constitutes “reasonable” in this context than I do.

 

Has anyone had the experience of activating a clause like this? Have you seen what a “reasonable cost-based fee” amounts to?

(I’ve also never seen the phrase “cost-based fee” before, have I just missed it elsewhere or is this sort of silly at first blush? What else would a fee be based upon if not a cost? The tears of serials librarians?)

 

Do I have any room for negotiating the terms here? Could I just strike out the part about a fee when I sign and return it? (Assuming we can afford the one-time purchase in any case…)

 

Thanks,

Andrew

 

Andrew M. Kelly

Cataloging & E-Resources Librarian

Paul Smith’s College Library

 

 


To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1

 

 


To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1

 

 

 


To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1



To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1