Re: Print vs. electronic serials in public libraries -- Buddy Pennington Stephen Clark 12 Apr 2002 14:43 UTC
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Print vs. electronic serials in public libraries -- Abby Schor Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:49:44 -0500 From: "MD_Buddy (Buddy Pennington)" <MD_Buddy@KCLIBRARY.ORG> We are in the middle of evaluating our periodicals collection and the issue of electronic vs. print does come into play. We do not have any hard, objective rules on this but if two titles are comparatively even on subject matter, academic level and price and one needs to be cut, we tend to cut the one that is available full-text in one of our databases. There is a caveat though. Databases are access-oriented and if a vendor loses the rights to a periodical, you also lose that periodical. A recent example is ProQuest losing the rights to the Harvard Business Review, Discover, Popular Science, and a host of other titles (many of which are moving to other databases). The database vendors are competing against each other for exclusive contracts to these periodicals, which means dwindling access to library customers since libraries cannot afford to get all the big databases that are out there. I also have noticed a trend. When we get patrons doing research and tending to need articles from academic journals, they tend to be the older volumes that are not available in our FT databases. Buddy Pennington Document Delivery Librarian Kansas City Public Library md_buddy@kclibrary.org 816-701-3552 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: print vs. electronic serials in public libraries Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 11:45:02 -0500 From: Abby Schor <aschor@AHML.LIB.IL.US> I am at a mid-sized public library, and we are currently considering the issue of print vs. electronic periodicals. We have seen the use of our paper periodicals drop, while electronic resource use goes up. Our paper collection seems to be used more for recreational or leisure purposes, while students and others doing research rely on electronic databases. Do any of you have a formula or other way to determine how much of your budget to devote to paper (or micoform) periodicals and how much for electronic databases? As an Illinois library, we are fortunate to have free access to many FirstSearch databases, and we subscribe to several of the Gale products (such as General Reference Center, Expanded Academic, General Business File, and Health Reference Center). Do you drop a subscription to a little-used paper or microform product if your vendor provides it full text? Do you have a policy covering such decisions? I'd be interested in anything you'd like to share about th! is, particularly from other public libraries. Abby Schor Collection Specialist Arlington Heights Memorial Library 500 N. Dunton Avenue Arlington Heights, Illinois 60004 847-870-4310 (voice) 847-392-0136 (fax)