Re: PAMS vs. ERMS Marshall, Susan 03 Nov 2004 22:45 UTC
Meg, I would like to add that I believe PAMS can develop an ERM for libraries. I know that among the "packed house" of attendees at the ERM networking node at NASIG in Milwaukie this year the position held by most who spoke up feel that our ILS's should develop an ERM similar to what Innovative has done. I disagree with this. In my experience, our ILS vendor takes a long time to develop a new module that actually is functional while companies like Serials Solutions and TDnet are small enough to be relatively quick to respond to their market. In addition, oftentimes when an ILS vendor gets something up and running there are large up-charges involved. Yes, our ILS has our data which can be easily imported into a newly developed module, but does it really have all of our titles? Aggregators? New titles added from year to year? While I try very diligently to report to our technical services librarians of our adds and drops in order to update our catalog, I miss some of them while Serials Solutions has all of our titles. Personally, I would prefer that Serials Solutions would come up with an ERM because they have all of my accurate up-to-date data and it is already in a grouped format by provider. They also know our business. They are intimately associated with serials and serials providers. How many of you are really using your ILS acquisitions modules for serials pricing? We aren't. It is not flexible enough to handle all of the nuances of serials package pricing structures not to mention a place to insert licensing information for a package. For Serials Solutions' non-subscribers, they would need to be able to create a way to export data from a variety of disparate systems in order to offer it as a product to all libraries. My hat goes off to Innovative for being at the forfront of an ERM development. They have created a standard that will be difficult to match by their ILS counterparts. Sue Marshall Electronic Resources Librarian Renne Library Montana State University P.O. Box 173320 Bozeman, MT 59717-3320 smarshall@montana.edu (406) 994-4313 Fax (406) 994-2851 -----Original Message----- From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU]On Behalf Of Frieda Rosenberg Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 2:27 PM To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU Subject: Re: [SERIALST] PAMS vs. ERMS Meg, More library acronyms (we love 'em). PAMs are companies (TDNet, Serials Solutions). ERMs are software offered by ILS vendors for tracking licenses and other data connected with your titles. Both have the purpose of helping you manage your electronic resources. Frieda Rosenberg UNC-Chapel Hill Del Baglivo, Meg wrote: >Hello All, > >Can anyone provide me with a good explanation of the difference between >PAMS (Publication Access Management Services) and ERMS (Electronic >Resources Management Systems)? I've had an inquiry from an administrator. >Thanks! Meg Del Baglivo > >Megan Del Baglivo, MLS >Acting Head of Collection Development >Electronic Resources/Continuations Cataloger >University of Maryland, Baltimore >Health Sciences & Human Services Library >601 W. Lombard St. >Baltimore, MD 21201-1512 >mdelbagl@hshsl.umaryland.edu >Tel: 410-706-7760 > >