Re: Some Questions on MARC Holdings Format Carmel Yurochko 25 Oct 2005 15:10 UTC
Please see below -----Original Message----- From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Hebard, Jeanne Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:40 AM To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU Subject: [SERIALST] Some Questions on MARC Holdings Format At my library we are converting our serial records to MARC Holdings format. I basically just started with turning on the MARC Holdings in our Sirsi serials module. Now I am beginning to enter some notes and adding the complete holding information. I am having a few questions as I continue this process and hope that someone can help me. My first question pertains to limited retention statements, for instance "Retained for 2 years plus current in print", and other format statements, for instance "microfilm 1929-2000". In what field should I be placing this information? Would these both be considered textual holdings (866 field) or are they part of a location statement (852 field) or are they something else entirely? I want these statements to be visible to the public. <<WE ADD THESE TYPES OF STATEMENTS INTO THE 852 FIELD...ADDING A "|" AND z FIRST>> The second question pertains to adding previous holdings. For instance, I have turned on the MARC Holdings since January 2005. The MARC holdings are working fine, but now I want to add the entire holdings including the holdings in the library prior to MARC holdings being turned on. I have been adding an 863 which shows our previous holdings. I would enter a subfield 81.1, followed by a subfield "a" with the starting volume and year of our holdings. I then renumber all the previously recorded 863s to follow in order. First, is this the correct way to do this and second is there a proper format? Should this first 863 reflect a closed holding statement such as 1969-2004, and the new MARC Holdings will show everything going forward? Or should the statement be open-ended as we are still receiving this title such as 1969-. A comma will separate the old holdings from the new MARC Holdings but I'm not sure which is correct or if it doesn't matter, which will be clearer to patrons. <<YOU HAVE HIT UPON A BIG "PROBLEM" WITH SIRSI AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED - THERE IS NO EASY WAY TO CREATE ONE CONTINOUS HOLDINGS LINE EASILY. WE HAD THE SAME SITUATION...WE ADD A "|" AND A z TO THE 852 AND ENTER "CURRENT RECEIVED" AS THE TEXT STATEMENT - SOMETIME I GO BACK AND PREDICT THE ISSUES, CHECK THE ISSUES IN, ETC. MAKES THE HOLDINGS STATEMENT LOOK GOOD IN THE OPAC BUT CAUSES A PROBLEM FOR CLAIMING (TOO MANY SCREEENS TO GO THROUGH)... WE HAVE MOSTLY USED THE 866 81.1a v.x-v.x, date-date AND HOPE THAT THE 852 STATEMENT MAKES IT KNOWN THAT THIS IS A CURRENT SUB,>> I hope these questions make sense. Any help that you can provide is greatly appreciated. <<THEY ARE GOOD QUESTION, BEEN THERE - DONE THAT, GOOD LUCK>> Thanks, <<YOU ARE WELCOM>> Jeanne Hebard Electronic Resources/Serials Librarian Horn Library, Babson College jhebard@babson.edu 781-239-6405 <<CARMEL YUROCHKO SERIALS/E.R. LIBRARIAN DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY PGH, PA 15282 yurochko@library.duq.edu>>