If you have electronic indexes which point to your holdings of the serial,
using, e.g., is ISSN, you will need to make sure that the appropriate links
from both records are in yours.

Michael S. Borries
CUNY Central Cataloging
151 East 25th Street, 5th Floor
New York, NY  10010
email: Michael.Borries@mail.cuny.edu
Phone: (646) 312-1687

                      Mitch Turitz
                      <turitz@SFSU.EDU>        To:       SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
                      Sent by:                 cc:
                      "SERIALST:               Subject:  Re: [SERIALST] Business Mexico (Mexico City, Mexico : 1991)
                      Serials in
                      Libraries
                      Discussion Forum"
                      <SERIALST@LIST.UV
                      M.EDU>

                      07/20/2006 05:37
                      PM
                      Please respond to
                      "SERIALST:
                      Serials in
                      Libraries
                      Discussion Forum"

Thank you for everyone who replied to my e-mail about BUSINESS
MEXICO.  It was great to get expert opinions on a problem that was
bothering me.  As to what I chose to do:

I took the advice of several people who agreed with:
* changing the 362 to end the first run of numbers and then add "[new
series]" for the 2nd numbering
* Added a note to explain numbering change.
* Added a note about absorbing MEXICO UPATE.
* Added a 780 05 to link to the absorbed title.
* Updated the subject headings to include:
>  651 0 Mexico $x Economic conditions $y 1994- $v Periodicals.
>  651 0 Mexico $x Economic conditions $y 1982-1994 $v Periodicals.
and I did NOT add a uniform title.

I am not sending in a change request to LC. I agree that they should
not go back and fix everything that would be cataloged differently if
it were done today. However in our local catalog, we can adjust the
cataloging for what works best with out patrons.

Thanks again,

Mitch

On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Mitch Turitz wrote:

>  Posted on 2 lists.  I apologize for duplication.
>
>  I have a question about an old title change I am cleaning up.  I
>looked at the
>  title Business Mexico (OCLC# 10535093), and "Business Mexico (Mexico
City,
>  Mexico : 1991)  OCLC# 23709222.
>
<SNIP>
>  In this case, since it was 15 years ago that it was cataloged and
>today we are
>  more into the "simplification" of cataloging, if this title would have
had
>  "[New Ser.] Vol. 1, no. 1 added to the 362 instead of doing
>successive entry if
>  you cataloged it? Or would you do successive entry and why?
>
>  Comments?
>
>  -- Mitch
>
>

--
  _^_                                                 _^_
(___)-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- ( ___ )
|   |                                               |   |
|   |     Mitch Turitz, Serials Librarian           |   |
|   |     San Francisco State University Library    |   |
|   |     Past President,                           |   |
|   |     SFSU California Faculty Association       |   |
|   |     voice: (415) 338-7883                     |   |
|   |     CFA:   (415) 338-6232                     |   |
|   |     FAX:   (415) 405-0394                     |   |
|   |                                               |   |
(___)-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-==- ( ___ )
   V                                                   V
           http://www.cfasf.org   (SFSU web site)
                   cfasf@igc.org) or Mitch Turitz (x. 87883;
turitz@sfsu.edu)
                        &
           http://www.calfac.org/  (CFA State-wide web site)