Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

$i is required in linking entry fields? Kay Teel (22 May 2013 19:45 UTC)
Re: $i is required in linking entry fields? Mike Saunders (22 May 2013 20:00 UTC)
Re: $i is required in linking entry fields? Kevin M Randall (22 May 2013 20:39 UTC)
Re: $i is required in linking entry fields? Mike Saunders (23 May 2013 12:58 UTC)
Re: $i is required in linking entry fields? Tarango, Adolfo (23 May 2013 14:54 UTC)

Re: $i is required in linking entry fields? Mike Saunders 22 May 2013 20:00 UTC

"If a cataloger wishes to indicate a known relationship" It sounds like it's your choice to me. Why bother when most OPACS will generate the "continues" and "continued by" automatically by the indicators that you choose..

Mike Saunders,

Serials Officer,

National Gallery of Canada

380 Sussex Drive

PO Box 427, Station A,

Ottawa, Ontario

K1N 9N4

-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Kay Teel
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 3:45 PM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: [SERIALST] $i is required in linking entry fields?

In the newly released PCC guidelines for relationship designators
http://www.loc.gov/aba/pcc/rda/PCC%20RDA%20guidelines/Relat-Desig-Guidelines.docx),
Guideline 14 says: "If a cataloger wishes to indicate a known
relationship to a known resource, and the $i relationship information
subfield is defined for the  MARC 7XX field being used, provide a
relationship designator. Do so even if the field coding otherwise
already expresses a relationship."

This sounds like it is now required of PCC (CONSER) records to include
$i in 76x-78x linking fields, for example:
780 00 $i Continues (work): $t Regional trends (London, England)
785 00 $i Continued by (work): $t Region and country profiles

Are mergers coded as:
785 00 $i Merged with: $t American electrician
785 00 $i To form: $t Electrical world (New York, N.Y. : 1906) ?

We wanted to confirm that this is now required and to be implemented
immediately. Although my library doesn't participate in CONSER, we
generally follow CONSER cataloging standards.

Kay Teel
Metadata Librarian for Serials and Arts Resources
Stanford University Libraries
Stanford, California
kteel@stanford.edu

***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* For additional information, see  the SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines <http://www.uvm.edu/~bmaclenn/serialst.html>
***********************************************

***********************************************
* You are subscribed to the SERIALST listserv (Serials in Libraries discussion forum)
* For additional information, see  the SERIALST Scope, Purpose and Usage Guidelines <http://www.uvm.edu/~bmaclenn/serialst.html>
***********************************************