Re: Newsweek, Dec/Jan issue (4 messages) Birdie MacLennan 29 Jan 1997 00:26 UTC
4 messages, 92 lines: (1)-------------------------- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 13:11:38 -0800 From: Bud Sonka <bsonka@NUNIC.NU.EDU> Subject: Re: Newsweek, Dec/Jan issue -request for info. On Tue, 28 Jan 1997, Meg Robinson Arnold wrote: > Has anyone had any definitive word (for instance, from the pub) on what the > heck NEWSWEEK was doing with their numbering in Dec last year, Jan this? The > last issue of v.128 appears to be no.27, dated Dec 30/Jan 6. The next issue > we rec'd was v.129,no. 2, Jan 13, 1997. Did they misnumber the Jan 13 issue? > Did they misnumber the Dec/Jan issue? Have we missed something, or not? Meg, They did the same thing last year (so did TIME, for that matter). It's because they used up the first week of the new year with their double issue in the last week of the old. This is a too frequent problem with weeklies, who obviously never have to bind their volumes. All you can do is enter a note that v.129 n.1 was never published. NEWSWEEK also had a v.128 n.28 special issue. And v.129 n.2 was mislabled v.124 n.2 because someone dosen't understand roman numerals. We entered notes on those two situations as well. Other than that, they're doing just fine, as near as I can tell. Bud Sonka Serial & Digital Resources Supervisor National University Library System San Diego (2)-------------------------- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 15:48:28 -0600 From: Virginia Kreyer <kreyer@MAIL.UWLAX.EDU> Subject: Re: Newsweek, Dec/Jan issue -request for info. When I called the publisher, I was told that the Dec 30/Jan 6 issues were combined, and that there is no issue v. 129, no. 2. I got the same response from the publishers of TIME and MACLEAN'S -- They also combined their Dec 30/Jan 6 issues, skipped number 1 of new volume, and called Jan. 13 "no. 2". In all three cases, the combined issue was the last issue of the prior volume (no double volume reference). GINNY KREYER E-MAIL: kreyer@mail.uwlax.edu PHONE: (608) 785-8759 FAX: (608) 785-8634 MURPHY LIBRARY: PERIODICALS UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LA CROSSE 1631 PINE STREET LA CROSSE, WI 54601 U.S.A. (3)------------------------- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 16:55:25 -0600 From: "Kevin M. Randall" <kmr@NWU.EDU> Subject: Re: Newsweek, Dec/Jan issue -request for info. We entered this issue into our holdings as: v.128:no.27/<v.129:no.1> The same thing happened last year. And it's not just NEWSWEEK. It seems that TIME, BUSINESS WEEK, and all the other major news/business weeklies are doing the same thing: issuing a year-end double issue that straddles the volumes, with the numbering goofed up (usually forgetting to add "no.1" of the next volume on the double issue). Was there some convention of newsweekly editors where they came up with this screwy idea??? Kevin M. Randall Head, Serials Cataloging Section Northwestern University Library Evanston, IL 60208-2300 email: kmr@nwu.edu phone: (847) 491-2939 **New Area Code!** fax: (847) 491-7637 (4)--------------------------- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 14:24:01 -0500 From: Debbi Karbofsky Scolnick <SCOLNICKD@LIBRARY.PHILA.GOV> Subject: Re: Newsweek, Dec/Jan issue -request for info. For the last few years, most of the major news magazines (Time, Newsweek, U.S. News) and some others have put out a double-sized issue toward the end of December, which is a "year-in-review" issue. It is usually counted as the last December and first January issue in one. Debbi Karbofsky Scolnick Free Library of Philadelphia scolnickd@library.phila.gov