Hello

The publishers have confirmed that the issue numbered v.51:no.8 should have
been numbered v.51 no.17.  The numbering will be corrected on subsequent
issues.

Joseph Sollitto, Editor
Serials Update Service
The Faxon Company
<sollitto@FAXON.COM>

Betsy Luce <bluce@CWMARSMAIL.CWMARS.ORG> wrote:

>Is it my mistake or is the September 13th, 1999 issue of National
>Review numbered incorrectly?  I recorded the last issue as
>vol.LI, #16 and this issue is numbered vol.LI,#8.  The year up until
>this point seems to be correctly numbered #1-16.  Does someone
>have an explanation?  Thanks.
>
>                                                Betsy Luce
>Betsy Cecilia Luce
>Shea Memorial Library
>American International College
>Springfield, MA  01109
>Mon-Thurs 4:30pm-12:00am
>bluce@cwmarsmail.cwmars.org
>
>My ideas and comments in no way reflect those of Shea
>Memorial Library or American International College.