To be fair, in some ways it maps to Age of Sail values. However, in any higher tech society, I suspect the proles would often know enough to recognize a terrible bet.

It's not so much the sensibilities I don't get in that model, its the reality of how you have a standard passage type (which means broad use and many vessels using them) in any sort of environment with the kind of failure rates we're talking about.

Unless the 3I has a lot of forced transportees, criminals being exiled to red zone planets, or other weird things that would normalize this form of travel, then it just wouldn't happen on the scale you'd need for it to become a standard passage mechanism.

Maybe the 3I *is* that sort of nasty place. Maybe we now know why there are unexplained Red Zones... Imperial Internal Security drop off points for inconvenient individuals.... (Dark Imperium, anyone?)

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:40 PM Kelly St. Clair <xxxxxx@efn.org> wrote:
LBB low berths are, by our standards, insanely hazardous because they're
based explicitly on a book where they were, including the part where
people would actually gamble on how many would die in transit.  It's a
bit of "life is cheap" values dissonance that doesn't really mesh well
with our pampered, first world, late-20th/early-21st notions.

The OTU is a weird mishmash of high-tech tools and capabilities and
low-tech ideas and sensibilities.

--
---------------
Kelly St. Clair
xxxxxx@efn.org

-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please go to
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=RDHE7iRpfwqlHvVvWBIhpJZsbTiD5NnL