T5 Sophont List
Donald McKinney
(12 Aug 2014 01:03 UTC)
|
Fogbank
Kurt Feltenberger
(12 Aug 2014 12:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
Bruce Johnson
(12 Aug 2014 14:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
Phil Pugliese
(12 Aug 2014 16:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
Bruce Johnson
(12 Aug 2014 16:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank Jeffrey Schwartz (12 Aug 2014 16:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
Phil Pugliese
(12 Aug 2014 18:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
shadow@xxxxxx
(12 Aug 2014 16:29 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
Bruce Johnson
(12 Aug 2014 17:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
Bruce Johnson
(12 Aug 2014 17:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
Jeffrey Schwartz
(12 Aug 2014 19:10 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
David Shaw
(12 Aug 2014 18:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
Bruce Johnson
(12 Aug 2014 20:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
Richard Aiken
(13 Aug 2014 08:08 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fogbank
Bruce Johnson
(12 Aug 2014 14:57 UTC)
|
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 12:14 PM, Bruce Johnson <johnson@pharmacy.arizona.edu> wrote: > > On the gripping hand, Oak Ridge may never really gotten out of it’s "Manhattan Project” 24/7 “we’re fighting an existential threat" mindset; that’s a powerful and hard-to-change institutional culture. > > "Get the job done, never mind the paperwork!" Or, perhaps, a more macabre version of the Y2k Attitude: "Yeah, in 40 years these things will need to be refurbished... but, what's the odds of them remaining unused that long? And if they get used, then nobody is going to care about documentation. If we do manage to avoid launching nuclear bombs for 40 years, it'll be the year 2000-something, and we'll all have robots to do all our work, and there will be no economic reason for war. Or else they'll be using beam cannons or Q-Bombs or something launched from space ships."