510 Field (2 messages) Marcia Tuttle 28 Feb 2002 13:50 UTC
----------(1) Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:23:02 -0500 From: Jean L Hirons <jhir@LOC.GOV> Subject: 510 field I wanted to respond to Steve Black's questions regarding 510 data in OCLC records. The 510 fields were added to CONSER records many years ago (mid 1980's) through the CONSER Abstracting and Indexing Coverage Project. The plan was that several national libraries, NSDP, and A&I services that joined CONSER at the affiliate level would maintain the data. Over the years, for a variety of reasons, much of the data has not been maintained and we know that there are new services out there that are not listed on the CONSER records. Several years ago, a CONSER task force was formed under the direction of Cindy Hepfer which surveyed the community about the 510 fields. The results were inconclusive: half wanted them removed from CONSER records, half wanted them retained! Those wanting them removed cited the length of records and the clutter of numerous 510 fields; those wanting them retained noted their usefulness for collection development and reference. In the meantime, there have been many commercial products designed to provide this information and this may be the better solution. Whether the 510 data should be retained in CONSER records will once again be examined during the coming year, but it is safe to say that we won't be able to update it. When we began working on the issue of providing access to journal titles in aggregators, we examined the use of the 510 field. But we realized that, like the A&I data, this information would become out of date and would have to be edited by every library to show only those services available in-house. Locally, of course, libraries are free to do whatever they would like with 510 fields. They may be added or deleted as a library sees fit. However, adding a link to whatever online database you subscribe to, such as Ulrich's or EBSCO's Serials Directory, might be a better approach as the link would not have to be maintained. Jean Hirons CONSER Coordinator Library of Congress 101 Independence Ave. SE Washington, DC 20540-4160 voice: 202-707-5947 fax: 202-707-1778 email: jhir@loc.gov ----------(2) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 07:13:00 EST From: Marlehurst@aol.com Subject: 510 Records Good Morning, Anne, Marcia, Steve, Carol, Sally, Alice... A friend has sent a copy of your e-mail discussion regarding the 510 records, which are so out-of-date. One alternative is to subscribe to the Serials MasterFile database: www.serialsmasterfile.com. It now contains over 32,000 titles from over 80 commercial indexes from Poole's to the currently published ones. Included are indexes that have ceased (Wellesley Index to Victorian Periodicals, Cumulated Magazine Subject Index, Abridged Index Medicus) as well. The coverage dates are included whenever available. For the coverage not available from the index publishers, the SMF editors make matrixes from the title-list front pages of the published indexes and develop the coverage dates from that information...i.e. British Education Index. It is also possible to create individualized comparison reports with the Custom Reports capability....making purchase and purging decisions possible at a very low cost. If you have and questions, just let us know. Best, Marlene Marlene Hurst, Senior Editor www.serialsmasterfile.com Tel: 248-788-0106 Fax: 248-788-2206