Email list hosting service & mailing list manager

(Previous discussion continued)
Re: Qualifier needed? Steven C Shadle (25 May 2004 15:40 UTC)

Re: Qualifier needed? Steven C Shadle 25 May 2004 15:40 UTC

Jim -- Technically speaking, the SAR is the one needing the qualifier (since it was added to the SAF six years after the serial record) but because of the number of analytic records involved I would probably qualify the serial record.  Without having records in hand (I'm away from work at the moment), not sure if there are other considerations.  -Steve

On Thu, 20 May 2004, Latchney, Jim wrote:

> Here's my situation:
> Crisalida (OCoLC)28165315, a serial, was added to OCLC on May 26, 1993 and didn't need a 130 at that time.
> On Nov. 10, 1999, Crisalida (OCoLC)5099938, was added as a series authority record--unqualified.
> Now, there is a conflict since the two are *not* the same.
> I can either add a 130 to the serial record, i.e. the easier thing to do,
> OR lock the series authority record, add the qualifier (Salobrena, Spain), add request bibliographic file maintenance to approx. 54 analytic records.
> Which way should I go?
>
> Jim Latchney
> Catalog Librarian &  Reference Librarian, Serials
> Michigan State University
> 100 Library
> East Lansing, MI 48824-1048
> (517) 432-6123 ext.317
> (517) 353-8969 (FAX)
> latchney@mail.lib.msu.edu
>
>
>