(Previous discussion continued)
|
||
Re: confusion over License language Ginanni, Katy (28 Oct 2008 14:44 UTC)
|
Re: confusion over License language Ginanni, Katy 28 Oct 2008 14:44 UTC
Ever since I saw the word "systematic" in Jenny's question, I've been thinking that it somehow referred to those improper uses where someone attempts to download hundreds of articles at a time, with help from a robot... Katy G. Katy Ginanni E-Access and Serials Librarian Coates Library, Trinity University San Antonio, TX 78212-7200 210-999-7613 ph. 210-999-8182 fax katy.ginanni@trinity.edu "The time is always right to do what is right." -- MLK, Jr. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. -----Original Message----- From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@list.uvm.edu] On Behalf Of Kristen Fredericksen Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 9:10 AM To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU Subject: Re: [SERIALST] confusion over License language I was taught that "systematic" means "regular." So systematic copying would be like sending another library articles from every single issue. Obviously, ILL would be more sporadic. I think the second phrase allows for temporary creation of a file for ILL. For instance, you print out the article, then scan it into Ariel, and send it to another library. It seems that e-reserves are prohibited. That's just my $.02. Does anyone disagree with my interpretation? Thanks, Kristen Jenny Lockwood wrote: > Greetings, > I find many of our licenses have the following standard phrases: > 1."the systematic making of print or electronic copies of Online > Content for transmission to non-subscribers or non-subscribing > institutions (such as inter-library loans) is prohibited." > 2. "Downloading portions of Online Content for the purpose of creating > pre-loaded, systematic and persistent local copies (not including > transient, dynamic caches of individually requested material) for > redistribution is prohibited." > > 1.Does anyone have a clear insight into whether ILL or Electronic > Reserves are allowed under these restrictions? If one is to interpret > that ILL is prohibited--why is the qualifier, systematic, included? > This phrase is included in licenses that reference fair use and those > that don't. > 2. Would Electronic Reserves be allowed or do you think the second > statement does not address this type of cache. > Thanks in advance for any enlightenment offered... > > Jenny > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Kristen Fredericksen Head of Information Processing Serials/Fast Track Processing Mullen Library 012 The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064-0001 Phone: 202-319-5073 Fax: 202-319-4181 -----------------------------------------------------