Pseudo-bib vs provisional records Marcia Tuttle 03 Feb 1992 21:55 UTC
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 1992 12:49:28 MST
Reply-To: "SEREDIT: SERIALST Editors" <SEREDIT@UVMVM>
Sender: "SEREDIT: SERIALST Editors" <SEREDIT@UVMVM>
From: FG17000 <FG17@UTEP>
Subject: Pseudo-bib vs provisional records
We are starting to put NOTIS acquisitions on line and have a request
for anyone who would like to respond. When should one use the pseudo-
bib record instead of the provisional record and why? Is one record
better than the other? Should one only use pseudo-bibs when working
with memberships and approvals or can one use a provisional record?
Thank you in advance for the answers we will receive.
Margaret Matthes, Serials Librarian
University of Texas at El Paso