Re: Upgrades to OCLC bibliographic records? (4 messages) Birdie MacLennan 12 Feb 1998 21:43 UTC
4 messages, 116 lines: (1)--------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 14:56:44 EST From: Beth Jedlicka <bethj@LIBRIS.LIBS.UGA.EDU> Organization: University of Georgia Libraries Subject: Re: Upgrades to OCLC bibliographic records? When I'm using a pre-AACR2 record in most cases I do not convert it to AACR2. In some cases that could take more time than editing it in the code it was done under. According to the CONSER Editing Guide (B4.2.4), generally, changes to records should be made in the context of the rules governing the record. (so if you have an A1 record you'd edit it according to that code). Except in the case of main or added entries. Those you update to AACR2 form. For your second question, my opinion is that you wouldn't want to reclass all those volumes (unless, I suppose, the call number is way off base). I would put the call number you've assigned locally in an 090 MARC tag. Hope this helps some, Beth Jedlicka Serials Cataloger University of Georgia (2)--------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:57:09 -0600 From: Maija CRAVENS <maija.cravens@CCMAIL.ADP.WISC.EDU> Subject: Re: Upgrades to OCLC bibliographic records? Yes, I always edit the record to current standards before exporting it to NOTIS. I also enhance the record if my authorization permits it. No, I see no need to change LC call numbers. They are, after all, only a shelf location code, and as long as your card catalog/online catalog has the same call no. as is found on the label, there won't be any problems locating the items. Maija CRAVENS <maija.cravens@CCMAIL.ADP.WISC.EDU> (3)-------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:29:00 CST From: "Kathi L. Jakubowski" <klr@gml.lib.uwm.edu> Subject: Re: Upgrades to OCLC bibliographic records? Kathleen, The only time I upgrade the record is if the form of the title or corporate heading is inconsistent with today's rules. We leave everything else, punctuation, form of 362 field etc., as is. We do not go back and reclassify a serial just because the record now has an LC call number - it would be an incredible job to tackle, and we have more than enough problems to deal with as we progress through retrospective conversion. Hope this helps. Kathi L. Jakubowski Head Serials Cataloger University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Golda Meir Library P.O. Box 604 Milwaukee, WI 53201 OFFICE: (414) 229-4752 FAX: (414) 229-6791 Internet: klr@gml.lib.uwm.edu (4)---------------------------- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 14:22:42 EDT From: "Charles F. Tremper" <cftrempe@library.syr.edu> Organization: Syracuse University Library Subject: Re: Upgrades to OCLC bibliographic records? Our policy has been to use pre A-2 records as is, IF they are correct according to the standards under which they were created. If the OCLC record is something of a mix, we will occasionally upgrade to A-2 standards. Due to the size of our backruns, we do not reclass if our local call number differs from LC. Good luck and keep dry. ********************************************* Charles F. Tremper Head, Serials Unit and Serials Catalogue Libn. Bibliographic Services Dept. Syracuse University Library Syracuse, N.Y. 13244 telephone: (315) 443-9775 email: cftrempe@hawk.syr.edu ---------------- Kathleen Thorne wrote: > Good morning - I have a couple of questions for all you serials > catalogers: first: when you use OCLC bibliographic records for > cataloging materials, do you upgrade the records to current AACR2 > standards if the record is an older one created under AACR standards, or > do you use the record in the exact form you find it? > > And second question: if you have journals which were cataloged & > classified back in the days preceding computer access to OCLC/LC > records, and the call numbers which were assigned then do not match the > call number assigned by LC, do you now go back and re-classify to the LC > call number (as found in the 050 field) and re-label all the bound > volumes, or do you leave them with the call number which the journal has > had in your library for all these years? > > Thanks - from soggy California.. > > Kathleen Thorne > Serials Cataloger > San Jose State University > kathleen@sjsuvm1.sjsu.edu