Re: Core journals (2 messages) ERCELAA@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu 16 Mar 1999 14:47 UTC
2 messages: 1)_____ Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 09:37:33 +0000 From: Carol Holliger <chhollig@CC.OWU.EDU> Subject: Core Journals revisited Dear Colleagues: I have received many e-mail messages asking for a summary of the discussion regarding core journals, but I'm also hearing that people want to see the original postings. I have asked the respondents to post their responses directly to the list so that we might all learn from this discussion. May we open this up to the entire list for discussion as of today? In the event that the original messages don't get posted, I will still try to summarize. :) Carol Holliger Serials Manager Beeghly Library Ohio Wesleyan University 43 Rowland Avenue Delaware, OH 43015 (740)368-3252 FAX (740)368-3222 chhollig@cc.owu.edu 2)______ Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 09:30:42 -0500 From: Linda Tilly <tillyl@MARIAN.EDU> Subject: Re: core journals I sent this to Carol last week, but since there appears to be a lot of interest I will resubmit to the list. ________________________________________ Hi Carol, We went through a collection evaluation over the last few years and I tried to find such core lists to help with the cancellation decisions, but I found very few. One helpful one I used for our nursing titles was the Brandon-Hill List a.k.a. "Selected List of Nursing books and journals" which is usually published in the Jan/Feb. issue of Nursing Outlook in even numbered years. The most current one is Jan/Feb. 1998. The other "list" I used was Katz's Magazines for Libraries, especially their designation for the "basic periodicals" for academic libraries within each discipline. I would be interested in hearing of more core lists if you receive any! Thanks! For our evaluation process, we did several things. First we conducted a usage study for one year (students recorded each issue/volume in a central book before reshelving). I then used these stats to calculate a cost-per-use for the current year's issues. We also surveyed the faculty and had them rank the titles in their discipline from 1-5 and then I compiled an average rank for each title. I also compiled information about whether each title was included in any indexes or databases that we had access to and whether the title was available in fulltext or not. Also, what area libraries also had current subscriptions to each title. And of course I included whether each title was on a list, such as Brandon/Hill or Katz. I also researched the cost of getting each title in microform. I was never able to develop a formula to weigh all these factors and determine one "score" for each title to make a hard-and-fast determination. But instead I used all the factors together to make a recommended list to the faculty of which ones should be kept, which should be acquired in microfilm only, and which should be discontinued. Usually the main determining factors for discontinuation were low use and high cost-per-use. We gave the faculty the chance to respond to our recommendations and usually if they could justify why the title should be maintained we did, as long as their budget allowed. And we did give them the option to suggest titles to replace those that were on the discontinue list, as long as they were affordable and they could justify why they were needed. We ended up trimming our periodical expenditures by about 22%. I know I have rambled on and may have only confused you. If you would like more clarification of any of it, please let me know and I will try! Hope this helps in some way! : ) Sincerely, Linda Tilly P.S. We are a small private liberal arts college with an enrollment of about 1300. Our current periodical subscriptions number about 500. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Linda S. Tilly Assistant Librarian Marian College Library (317) 955-6223 3200 Cold Spring Road (317) 955-6418 FAX Indianapolis, IN 46222 email: tillyl@tuvok.marian.edu ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^