|
It's a BIG one!
Phil Pugliese
(13 Apr 2017 18:59 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Kurt Feltenberger
(13 Apr 2017 19:56 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Postmark
(14 Apr 2017 22:38 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Rupert Boleyn
(14 Apr 2017 22:50 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Bruce Johnson
(14 Apr 2017 23:27 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Charles Brogdon
(14 Apr 2017 23:16 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Bruce Johnson
(14 Apr 2017 23:25 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Rupert Boleyn
(15 Apr 2017 00:01 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Michael Houghton
(14 Apr 2017 23:50 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Richard Aiken
(19 Apr 2017 00:29 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Rupert Boleyn (19 Apr 2017 00:59 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one!
Richard Aiken
(19 Apr 2017 01:13 UTC)
|
||
On 19Apr2017 1229, Richard Aiken wrote: > That is my understanding as well. The commentator I heard said that all > the oxygen in the radius of effect is consumed in less than a second. > Essentially, it's intended to smother every dug-in enemy within reach at > once. The MOABs are conventional bombs, so they don't consume the local oxygen. For that you should use a fuel-air/thermobaric weapon. -- Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief
