CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Thomas RUX (23 Oct 2019 02:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Phil Pugliese (23 Oct 2019 15:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Thomas RUX (23 Oct 2019 16:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Ethan McKinney (25 Oct 2019 00:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Thomas RUX (25 Oct 2019 01:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Ethan McKinney (25 Oct 2019 02:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Rupert Boleyn (25 Oct 2019 12:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Thomas RUX (25 Oct 2019 14:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Phil Pugliese (25 Oct 2019 16:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Ethan McKinney (25 Oct 2019 21:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Thomas RUX (25 Oct 2019 21:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Rupert Boleyn (26 Oct 2019 00:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Thomas RUX (26 Oct 2019 01:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Rupert Boleyn (26 Oct 2019 01:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Thomas RUX (26 Oct 2019 13:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Thomas RUX (25 Oct 2019 13:32 UTC)

Re: [TML] CT LBB 2 1977, 1981 Computer question Thomas RUX 26 Oct 2019 01:07 UTC

Hello Rupert,

The Computer Programming rules on CT LBB 2 1977 page 31 gave a hint that the computer's model number limits the jump rating because of the CPU processing capacity having to run the appropriate jump program and navigation program at the same time.

Technically, CT LBB 3's Technological Level chart provides the availability for the CT LBB 2 computers and jump drives.

Tom Rux

> On October 25, 2019 at 5:22 PM Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 26Oct2019 0554, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) wrote:
>
> >  It seems that most of the ship designs that GDW published have a
> > little 'something' in them that doesn't quite jibe, doesn't it?
> > Frankly, I've never noticed that little glitch. Anyway, it's easy to
> > fix; If you're like me wrt computer & max jump capability, just
> > redesign the Scout w/ a Model/2 or a Model/1bis. p.s. The discrepancy
> > can then be 'rationalized' as a pre-prub typo or transcription
> > error.
>
> That would be the obvious fix, and it's the model that the Type S was
> given in the 2nd edition (though that edition added the rule about model
> limiting jump range, so it had to be fixed anyway).
>
> --
> Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
> -----
> The Traveller Mailing List
> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
> To unsubscribe from this list please go to
> http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=zZOCJCw2BI9jPrGTB4OJoibiHbbTEiok