Type-S walk through, of sorts Jeffrey Schwartz (27 Mar 2021 21:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Phil Pugliese (27 Mar 2021 21:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Jeffrey Schwartz (27 Mar 2021 22:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Timothy Collinson (29 Mar 2021 09:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Jeffrey Schwartz (29 Mar 2021 16:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Phil Pugliese (29 Mar 2021 17:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Rupert Boleyn (30 Mar 2021 02:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Thomas RUX (30 Mar 2021 13:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Bruce Johnson (30 Mar 2021 22:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Rupert Boleyn (31 Mar 2021 00:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Phil Pugliese (31 Mar 2021 08:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Thomas RUX (31 Mar 2021 12:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Alex Goodwin (31 Mar 2021 19:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Thomas RUX (31 Mar 2021 20:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Jeffrey Schwartz (31 Mar 2021 14:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Mark Urbin (31 Mar 2021 16:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Phil Pugliese (31 Mar 2021 18:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Mark Urbin (31 Mar 2021 19:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Phil Pugliese (31 Mar 2021 19:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Thomas RUX (31 Mar 2021 20:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Mark Urbin (31 Mar 2021 21:24 UTC)

Re: [TML] Type-S walk through, of sorts Jeffrey Schwartz 31 Mar 2021 14:29 UTC

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 6:11 PM Bruce Johnson
<xxxxxx@pharmacy.arizona.edu> wrote:

>
> “Yeah the aft staterooms have always smelled a wee bit funky since those hydraulic lines blew and we had to put out the fire by venting half the ship to vacuum…"

I'm building this at TL-13... and going through NASA documents on
TL7/8  space shuttle and ISS for inspiration and thinking things
through
One of the biggest simplifications is saying that TL13 has
electrodynamic metals rather than hydraulics... because of all the
huge support chain to make hydraulics work
Shuttle Hydraulics needed APU ... which needed fuel cells running and
needed its own reactant supplies and needed lots of heat dumping and
then controls and monitoring for all that and another layer of
controls and monitoring on the controls so you could switch to
redundant control network. AND then redundant APU and everything else
again.

Gravitics and M-Drive are huge simplifiers too - just getting rid of
RCS and making it part of the M-Drive greatly simplifies things