Regarding My Reconfigurable Fusion Torch Rocket
Richard Aiken
(20 Aug 2022 05:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Regarding My Reconfigurable Fusion Torch Rocket
Jeffrey Schwartz
(22 Aug 2022 14:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Regarding My Reconfigurable Fusion Torch Rocket
Ethan McKinney
(23 Aug 2022 00:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Regarding My Reconfigurable Fusion Torch Rocket
kaladorn@xxxxxx
(23 Aug 2022 03:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Regarding My Reconfigurable Fusion Torch Rocket Rupert Boleyn (23 Aug 2022 12:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Regarding My Reconfigurable Fusion Torch Rocket
Richard Aiken
(24 Aug 2022 00:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Regarding My Reconfigurable Fusion Torch Rocket Rupert Boleyn 23 Aug 2022 12:52 UTC
On 23Aug2022 1527, kaladorn at gmail.com (via tml list) wrote: > That's interesting, yet a bit odd just as stated. I can understand an > air-ram mode in atmospheres of sufficient density and if your ship is > flying quickly enough. That part is makes some sense. > > The parts I would wonder about: > 1) The description is a bit sloppy. It says it works in non-breathable > atmospheres. Fine and good, but don't call it 'air'. It's atmosphere or a > gas mix or whatever, but air should only apply to either only breathable > for human atmospheres or some other definition, but a methane atmosphere > ain't air in any sense I've ever heard. > 2) The system supposedly rams in atmosphere at flight speeds and compresses > them (hence the ram effect). It heats it with the reactor. Okay, if it's an > earth like atmo, it may have some humidity in the lower layers. Flash heat > that in and you get steam and a big expansion inside the engine, not so? If > you want atmo to flow very fast through the system, wouldn't that shake the > ship severely? What about other gas mixes that have low temperatures of > ignition and a lot of brisance? Hydrocarbon explosions might ensue. I'm > sure some other atmospheric components might, when rammed, undergo > reactions such as combustion or even a chemical change perhaps. > 3) I'm curious how this 'doesn't use fuel'. If true, that would seem to > make it the perpetual motion machine.... methinks some kind of fuel is > being used. Reactor is doing something to produce heat in high enough > volumes to meaningfully heat the reaction mass (rammed atmo) enough to > eject it out a venturi or some such to get a meaningful thrust. That uses > fuel to run. And to get your ship up to the point where it can ram atmo, > fuel has to be expended. So it isn't like no fuel is going to be > expended... once you get into a sufficient velocity to ram enough atmo > through and superheat it, then maybe you can ride that up and out of atmo > or even just around to travel inside the atmo at a sufficient speed. > 4) How do you maneuver at slow speeds like when starting out or heading in > for a landing? You can't be ramming air in enough volume in that phase. > This would be where an auxiliary propulsion system would be, not so? > > TomB It's probably a turbo-ram, so works like a turbojet at 'low' velocities and a ramjet once the vessel is moving fast enough for the ramjet effect to function. As for 'fuel' - the engine has a nuclear reactor of some sort built in, so while it will be using fuel it's at a very slow rate that can be ignored. -- Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>