CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed???
Phil Pugliese
(03 Mar 2015 16:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed???
Leslie Bates
(03 Mar 2015 16:33 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed???
Phil Pugliese
(03 Mar 2015 17:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed??? Bruce Johnson (03 Mar 2015 18:04 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed???
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(03 Mar 2015 22:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed???
Fred Kiesche
(06 Mar 2015 14:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed??? Bruce Johnson 03 Mar 2015 18:04 UTC
my Classic CT CD contains only one ‘Mercenary' pdf. Other books that had significant edition changes have both books in the collection: Books 1-3 are present in the 1977 and 1981 editions and both High Guard editions are present. in the html list of book on the disk the 1977 edition of books 1-3 and the first ed book 5 are listed as ‘obsolete’. The ‘Mercenary’ in the collection is copywritten 1978. > On Mar 3, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote: > > This email was sent from yahoo.com which does not allow forwarding of emails via email lists. Therefore the sender's email address (xxxxxx@yahoo.com) has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message follows: > > ============================================================================== > > I've seen the 1981 printing of 'Mercenary' referred to as "the 2nd edition" so I just wondered... -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs