Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (23 Jun 2015 21:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 05:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 06:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 06:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 07:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Kelly St. Clair (24 Jun 2015 07:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 07:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Knapp (24 Jun 2015 20:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 07:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 07:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 07:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 08:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Grimmund (24 Jun 2015 13:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Jeffrey Schwartz (24 Jun 2015 15:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Grimmund (24 Jun 2015 16:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Jeffrey Schwartz (24 Jun 2015 16:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 16:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Craig Berry (24 Jun 2015 17:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 19:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (28 Jun 2015 07:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Grimmund (28 Jun 2015 12:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (28 Jun 2015 12:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (29 Jun 2015 06:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 07:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 08:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Kelly St. Clair (24 Jun 2015 09:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Kelly St. Clair (24 Jun 2015 09:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 11:00 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (25 Jun 2015 00:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (25 Jun 2015 02:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (25 Jun 2015 02:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 22:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (25 Jun 2015 00:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (25 Jun 2015 00:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 23:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 23:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question shadow@xxxxxx (25 Jun 2015 06:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Knapp (26 Jun 2015 09:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (27 Jun 2015 01:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question shadow@xxxxxx (27 Jun 2015 03:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (27 Jun 2015 07:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (27 Jun 2015 11:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Grimmund (27 Jun 2015 11:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (27 Jun 2015 19:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Kelly St. Clair (27 Jun 2015 20:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (27 Jun 2015 14:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question W. Hopper (27 Jun 2015 16:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Phil Pugliese (27 Jun 2015 16:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (27 Jun 2015 16:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (28 Jun 2015 07:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (27 Jun 2015 20:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 20:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 09:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 11:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 19:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Jeffrey Schwartz (24 Jun 2015 12:32 UTC)

Re: [TML] Another Question Phil Pugliese 27 Jun 2015 16:26 UTC

I'm beginning to think that the exact meaning of the phrase 'wired for' is highly dependent upon context.

For me, personally, the term 'the room is wired for sound' means that the room has mics &/or speakers installed.
The term 'wired for the network' means only that there are receptacles avail to attach to.
As far as 'the human brain is wired for' goes, at least for me, it depends on what the topic is.
It could go either way.

Funny thing, it's something I've never really thought about till now but this appears to be one of those things can be easily understood while conversing face-to-face but just as easily misunderstood when not...

--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 6/27/15, W. Hopper <xxxxxx@pobox.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML] Another Question
 To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 Date: Saturday, June 27, 2015, 9:16 AM

 So what
 does it mean that "Newborn Brain May Be Wired For
 Speech"? 
 https://www.dana.org/BrainWork/2008/Newborn_Brain_May_Be_Wired_for_Speech/ 
 It simply means that the neural
 pathways in the brain are in place.  It does not imply any
 implanted physical hardware.

 On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at
 9:06 AM, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Greg
 Chalik <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
 wrote:

 On
 27 June 2015 at 17:47, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 On Fri, Jun 26, 2015
 at 11:44 PM,  <xxxxxx@shadowgard.com>
 wrote:
 Your
 usage was apparently "has connections for"

 Usage I am (and apparently other folks on tne list are) used
 to is

 "has the gear already installed & working"

 Even
 "has connections for" means - in COMMON usage -
 that the item has the PHYSICAL parts required to hook up the
 relevant bits of subsidiary tech already installed. In this
 sense, a laptop or a smart phone is "wired for"
 HDMI connection to other devices by having at least one HDMI
 port actually installed into it at the factory. There used
 to exist (before such models were made obsolete through lack
 of same) such devices that came from the factory without
 such "wired for"
 connections. ​A​ll
 electical devices come from the factory wired for
 electricity. They just need a wall socket.

 Apparently the use of hyperbole as a
 discussion tactic is something you find
 comforting.
 ASSUMING
 this is so in the rest of your communications, one can
 readily see why the USMC might take your "advice"
 with a metric ton of sodium. The
 mind does not work on electricty, either AC or DC.

 I call
 [male cattle excrement] on that: http://jonlieffmd.com/blog/brain-electricity-and-the-mind
  

 Given the above, the assumption (as
 I and other have stated) is that a human "wired from
 birth" for control of external electronics will have
 the relevant data ports installed into their nervous systems
 as physical cyberwear.
   ​ A
 million people making the same assumption, is still an
 assumption.
 So?
 "Democracy is based on the
 assumption that a million men are wiser than one man.
 How's that again? I missed something. Autocracy is based
 on the assumption that one man is wiser than a million men.
 Let's play that over again too. Who decides?"
 Robert A. Heinlein

 Since
 most people [including probably 99+% of this list] in modern
 Western culture would rather live under a democracy than an
 autocracy, I'm okay with the concept that a million
 people agreeing that an author writing for general
 consumption is using the ASSUMED meaning of his words,
 unless he SPECIFICALLY states otherwise.
 It
 would have been better if you asked if you were unsure what
 exactly I meant than assume

 More bovine excrement.
 So you apparently believe that EVERY
 response to EVERY post on this list (or any other written
 communication) should be prefaced with: 
 "Assuming the author to whom I
 am replying is using the COMMON DEFINITION of the words he
 used, I am replying thusly."
 If you DON'T believe this
 statement should be used by EVERY respondent, then how do
 you propose that someone should go about picking which
 missive should use the ASSUMED values and which should
 require such special questioning?
 My. God.
 Here I am, wasting my time, actually
 trying to reason with an internet troll.
 --
 Richard Aiken

 "Never insult anyone by
 accident."  Robert A. Heinlein"A word
 to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones
 that need the advice." - Bill Cosby"We
 know a little about a lot of things; just enough to make us
 dangerous." Dean Winchester

 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://archives.simplelists.com

 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to xxxxxx@travellercentral.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=EwREIRgLK8vaUEhNlnoNdSGKwnjoID8a