Does anyone remember??? Phil Pugliese (01 Sep 2015 19:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Does anyone remember??? Bruce Johnson (01 Sep 2015 19:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Does anyone remember??? Phil Pugliese (02 Sep 2015 15:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Does anyone remember??? John Geoffrey (05 Sep 2015 13:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Does anyone remember??? Phil Pugliese (05 Sep 2015 15:07 UTC)

Re: [TML] Does anyone remember??? Phil Pugliese 02 Sep 2015 15:50 UTC

--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 9/1/15, Bruce Johnson <xxxxxx@Pharmacy.Arizona.EDU> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML] Does anyone remember???
 To: "xxxxxx@simplelists.com" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 Date: Tuesday, September 1, 2015, 12:51 PM

 > On
 Sep 1, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list)
 <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 wrote:
 >
 > This email
 was sent from yahoo.com which does not allow forwarding of
 emails via email lists. Therefore the sender's email
 address (xxxxxx@yahoo.com)
 has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message
 follows:
 >
 > Earlier
 this year I accessed some Trav stuff at archive.org &,
 unfortunately, I've managed to lose the links & I
 can't seem to enter the correct search parameters
 either.
 >
 > I believe
 that I originally picked up the info from a post here on the
 TML.
 > Which I (naturally) can't find
 either!
 > So, does anyone remember
 posting a link thru archive.org that pointed to Trav
 stuff?

 I don’t remember,
 but did you search the TML archives for ‘wayback
 machine’ likely it would have been stuff from an archived
 website.

 --
 Bruce Johnson
 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the tip Bruce...

I went back & discovered that it was part of a thread where Tim Collinson was searching for info for his biblio work.
I had been looking at the archived misc Trav mags listing & came across an interactive text novel that was included w/ the old mags. For some reason I failed to d/l it &, as it turns out, the item probably was removed & should NOT have been avail in the 1st place as it was republished in 2005 & is avail for sale on Amazon, etc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------