[TML] Truck Stops Rather Than Air/Seaports
Richard Aiken
(19 Apr 2016 04:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Truck Stops Rather Than Air/Seaports
Jeffrey Schwartz
(19 Apr 2016 13:28 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Truck Stops Rather Than Air/Seaports
Rob Davenport
(19 Apr 2016 15:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Truck Stops Rather Than Air/Seaports
Richard Aiken
(19 Apr 2016 22:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Truck Stops Rather Than Air/Seaports
Bruce Johnson
(20 Apr 2016 16:39 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Truck Stops Rather Than Air/Seaports rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx (20 Apr 2016 21:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Truck Stops Rather Than Air/Seaports
Richard Aiken
(21 Apr 2016 01:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Truck Stops Rather Than Air/Seaports rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx 20 Apr 2016 21:16 UTC
On 20 Apr 2016 at 16:39, Bruce Johnson wrote: > oBTrav, since the entire economic system of the OTU is pretty much > based on this model (fer gawdsakes the ONLY thing covered by `law > level´ is just how big of a gun you can carry in public) I´d > expect it to translate right on over, so there are probably a crapton > of worlds that are essentially mined-out toxic dumps. After all when > corporations can have military divisions, the concept of rule of law > was gone a long long time ago; Ol´ Cleon 1 built his empire on > economic warfare and genocide, and the 3I took it´s cue from that. > This is what `Rule of Man´ entails. Law Level does also cover the rate of police harrasment of off-worlders. It's darkly amusing that Traveller links these, given that the US experience is that they're not linked at all. > The member worlds have nominal autonomy, but since the 3I controls the > `space between the worlds´ any place that gets out of line can be > Shock Doctrine´d into submission tout suite. Or just trade embargoed into submission. Even if the world is self-sufficient the local elites will be missing their luxuries pretty quick.