Earth 2?
Phil Pugliese
(25 Aug 2016 20:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Earth 2?
C. Berry
(25 Aug 2016 20:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Earth 2?
Richard Aiken
(26 Aug 2016 05:52 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Earth 2?
Bruce Johnson
(26 Aug 2016 18:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Earth 2? Tim (29 Aug 2016 00:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Earth 2? Tim 29 Aug 2016 00:58 UTC
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 07:59:55PM +0000, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) wrote: > This email was sent from yahoo.com which does not allow forwarding of emails via email lists. Therefore the sender's email address (xxxxxx@yahoo.com) has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message follows: > > Let's talk a little about the new earth-like planet planet that's been discovered recently, right next door. > > From what I've seen & heard, it's orbiting Proxima Centauri & is so far from Alpha Centauri A&B that they would appear as a single star to an observer in orbit around the planet. > I must say I was surprised to see such a planet discovered around a red dwarf but, assuming that it is in fact 'earth-like', I wonder what it would be like on the surface. > > How would the reddish light affect vision? Hardly at all. It would be a bit whiter than most incandescent lights, and not really distinguishable from our sunlight unless one saw them side by side. > How bright would the 'dwarf appear to be to the naked eye from the > surface? Too dazzlingly bright to look at for long without risking eye damage. Visually much the same brightness would be spread over a somewhat larger disc in the sky, but this wouldn't make very much difference. > What, if any, would be the effect of the 'redness?' (a more > infra-red compared to Sol) of the of the dwarf's radiation be? > Would it possible to get a 'sunburn'? The biggest difference would be far less ultraviolet from the star, but still ample to get a very nasty sunburn very quickly in the absence of an ozone layer in an oxygen atmosphere. One counterintuitive effect is that the reduced UV output would not maintain as great a concentration of ozone in an Earthlike atmosphere, so the amount of UV reaching the surface could actually be greater. This is dependent upon many other variables, though. > Also, as I recall, Proxima actually orbits A&B. We still don't know for sure. It seems likely. > How far away is that orbit compared to our solar system? > Is it farther away than Uranus? About 800 times farther. Far enough that they would just appear as stars, but close enough that Alpha Centauri A and B would be by far the two brightest stars in the night sky (magnitudes -6 and -5) and even visible during the day. They would normally be visually distinct from one another, but only up to 6 arcminutes apart -- about 1/5 the visual diameter of the Moon. - Tim