|
Re: [TML] 1G ship vs Size 8world. David Jaques-Watson (10 Oct 2017 03:19 UTC)
|
||
|
(missing)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] 1G ship vs Size 8world.
C. Berry
(10 Oct 2017 05:11 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] 1G ship vs Size 8world.
Phil Pugliese
(10 Oct 2017 11:25 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] 1G ship vs Size 8world.
Richard Aiken
(10 Oct 2017 23:29 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] 1G ship vs Size 8world.
C. Berry
(10 Oct 2017 23:35 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] 1G ship vs Size 8world.
Rupert Boleyn
(10 Oct 2017 23:55 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] 1G ship vs Size 8world.
Kurt Feltenberger
(11 Oct 2017 00:21 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] 1G ship vs Size 8world.
Richard Aiken
(11 Oct 2017 00:25 UTC)
|
||
|
Re: [TML] 1G ship vs Size 8world.
Richard Aiken
(11 Oct 2017 00:27 UTC)
|
||
Re: [TML] 1G ship vs Size 8world. David Jaques-Watson 10 Oct 2017 03:19 UTC
Dear Folks – Catherine wrote: > Other ships in the traffic pattern would also be unlikely to appreciate being hit by such beams. Firefly vs the Reavers. Pretty sure Firefly's engines could be designed as HePlaR... fire them once, then coast to your destination. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- David "Hyphen" Jaques-Watson ..at.. Beowulf Down (Tavonni/Vilis/SM 1520) http://www.tip.net.au/~davidjw xxxxxx@pcug.org.au "I file things in historical order, with a hashing algorithm of gravity"