Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (25 Nov 2019 23:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Thomas Jones-Low (25 Nov 2019 23:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 21:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Rupert Boleyn (27 Nov 2019 12:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Ethan McKinney (28 Nov 2019 07:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Ethan McKinney (26 Nov 2019 01:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 22:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Ethan McKinney (26 Nov 2019 22:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Kurt Feltenberger (26 Nov 2019 02:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 22:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Kelly St. Clair (26 Nov 2019 02:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Rupert Boleyn (26 Nov 2019 05:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Ethan McKinney (26 Nov 2019 15:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Bruce Johnson (26 Nov 2019 16:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Cian Witherspoon (26 Nov 2019 16:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Ethan McKinney (26 Nov 2019 16:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Rupert Boleyn (27 Nov 2019 12:37 UTC)
Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Cian Witherspoon (27 Nov 2019 13:04 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Rupert Boleyn (27 Nov 2019 13:50 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Rupert Boleyn (27 Nov 2019 14:02 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Cian Witherspoon (27 Nov 2019 14:18 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Rupert Boleyn (27 Nov 2019 14:21 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Cian Witherspoon (27 Nov 2019 14:33 UTC)
Drop tanks Thomas RUX (27 Nov 2019 16:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Phil Pugliese (28 Nov 2019 02:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Ethan McKinney (28 Nov 2019 03:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Phil Pugliese (28 Nov 2019 21:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Thomas RUX (02 Dec 2019 20:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Jeffrey Schwartz (09 Dec 2019 15:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Thomas RUX (09 Dec 2019 15:52 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Thomas RUX (27 Nov 2019 14:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 22:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeffrey Schwartz (26 Nov 2019 15:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Rupert Boleyn (26 Nov 2019 15:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeffrey Schwartz (26 Nov 2019 15:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 22:20 UTC)

Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Kurt Feltenberger 26 Nov 2019 02:02 UTC

On 11/25/2019 6:35 PM, Jeff Zeitlin wrote:
> The standard cutter module is a cylinder, given as 15m long and 6m
> diameter, for a displacement of 30dT. However, because of the shape, less
> than the full 30dT is usable.
>
> What are the ramifications of building a module with cutter-compatible
> fittings, but square in cross-section, 6m wide, 6m high, and 15m long, for
> a total (and usable) volume of 40dT?

One thing that I thought was sort of implied with the standard small
craft is that they were considered "Industry Standard" in that a
"cutter" made by company A will fit all the fixtures and modules of a
"cutter" made by companies B, C, D, E, F, etc.

If you deviate from the dimensions, while it may still be a "cutter" in
job or capabilities, it is no longer considered standard.

--
Kurt Feltenberger
xxxxxx@thepaw.org/xxxxxx@yahoo.com
“Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not living enough." - Me