Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (25 Nov 2019 23:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Thomas Jones-Low (25 Nov 2019 23:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 21:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Rupert Boleyn (27 Nov 2019 12:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Ethan McKinney (28 Nov 2019 07:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Ethan McKinney (26 Nov 2019 01:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 22:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Ethan McKinney (26 Nov 2019 22:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Kurt Feltenberger (26 Nov 2019 02:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 22:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Kelly St. Clair (26 Nov 2019 02:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Rupert Boleyn (26 Nov 2019 05:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Ethan McKinney (26 Nov 2019 15:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Bruce Johnson (26 Nov 2019 16:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Cian Witherspoon (26 Nov 2019 16:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Ethan McKinney (26 Nov 2019 16:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Rupert Boleyn (27 Nov 2019 12:37 UTC)
Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Cian Witherspoon (27 Nov 2019 13:04 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Rupert Boleyn (27 Nov 2019 13:50 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Rupert Boleyn (27 Nov 2019 14:02 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Cian Witherspoon (27 Nov 2019 14:18 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Rupert Boleyn (27 Nov 2019 14:21 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Cian Witherspoon (27 Nov 2019 14:33 UTC)
Drop tanks Thomas RUX (27 Nov 2019 16:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Phil Pugliese (28 Nov 2019 02:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Ethan McKinney (28 Nov 2019 03:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Phil Pugliese (28 Nov 2019 21:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Thomas RUX (02 Dec 2019 20:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Jeffrey Schwartz (09 Dec 2019 15:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Drop tanks Thomas RUX (09 Dec 2019 15:52 UTC)
Re: Mass vs Volume (was Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q) Thomas RUX (27 Nov 2019 14:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 22:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeffrey Schwartz (26 Nov 2019 15:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Rupert Boleyn (26 Nov 2019 15:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeffrey Schwartz (26 Nov 2019 15:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin (26 Nov 2019 22:20 UTC)

Re: [TML] Cutter Module Q Jeff Zeitlin 26 Nov 2019 22:20 UTC

On Tue, 26 Nov 2019 10:12:02 -0500, Jeffrey Schwartz
<xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote to Freelance Traveller:

>Are you suggesting an IMTU Retcon on cutter module shape?
>If so, yeah, makes perfect sense, I endorse it.
>Makes a lot of the published ship designs not work, though, since the
>space allocated for spare cutter modules needs to expand.
>
>The square makes a lot of sense, and someone else said "LASH" and it
>also makes sense for container stacking shore-side.

Not so much a retcon as an optional alternative, e.g., for quick
"construction" groundside, or for LASH.

>I have a suggestion:
>In looking at the definition of "cutter", it looks like "Sloop" is the
>next step up.
>I'd propose the design of a new small craft class : 80 ton Sloop.
>It uses a 6x6x15m module, has a 6x6m cross section on the nose (8m
>long streamlined that has the same volume as 6x6x7) and tail (6x6x8
>box) portions.
>One feature of the Sloop class is the fold-down anchor arms on the
>inside of the pod-bay that allow it to latch a 30 ton cylinder module
>in place for reverse compatibility.

Write it up for the Shipyard!

>On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 6:36 PM Jeff Zeitlin
><xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com> wrote:
>>
>> The standard cutter module is a cylinder, given as 15m long and 6m
>> diameter, for a displacement of 30dT. However, because of the shape, less
>> than the full 30dT is usable.
>>
>> What are the ramifications of building a module with cutter-compatible
>> fittings, but square in cross-section, 6m wide, 6m high, and 15m long, for
>> a total (and usable) volume of 40dT?
>>
>>
>> ®Traveller is a registered trademark of
>> Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2018. Use of
>> the trademark in this notice and in the
>> referenced materials is not intended to
>> infringe or devalue the trademark.
>>
>> --
>> Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
>> Freelance Traveller
>>     The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
>> xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
>> http://www.freelancetraveller.com
>>
>> Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
>> enterprises for hosting services:
>>
>> onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)
>> The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)
>> -----
>> The Traveller Mailing List
>> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
>> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
>> To unsubscribe from this list please go to
>> http://archives.simplelists.com
>-----
>The Traveller Mailing List
>Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
>Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
>To unsubscribe from this list please go to
>http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=uVyfonVzlsGwnSKN2tn21umMrgO3BRd9

®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2018. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.

--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
    The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
http://www.freelancetraveller.com

Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:

onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)
The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)