refuelling... not at a gas giant Timothy Collinson (10 Oct 2020 19:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Rupert Boleyn (11 Oct 2020 00:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant kaladorn@xxxxxx (11 Oct 2020 00:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant kaladorn@xxxxxx (11 Oct 2020 00:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Rupert Boleyn (11 Oct 2020 05:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant kaladorn@xxxxxx (11 Oct 2020 06:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Rupert Boleyn (11 Oct 2020 06:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant kaladorn@xxxxxx (11 Oct 2020 06:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Rupert Boleyn (11 Oct 2020 07:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Kelly St. Clair (11 Oct 2020 07:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant James Catchpole (11 Oct 2020 09:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Thomas RUX (11 Oct 2020 17:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Rupert Boleyn (11 Oct 2020 18:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Thomas RUX (11 Oct 2020 18:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Phil Pugliese (12 Oct 2020 17:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Cian Witherspoon (12 Oct 2020 18:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Thomas Jones-Low (12 Oct 2020 18:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Thomas RUX (12 Oct 2020 20:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant James Catchpole (11 Oct 2020 02:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant kaladorn@xxxxxx (11 Oct 2020 03:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant James Catchpole (11 Oct 2020 04:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Rupert Boleyn (11 Oct 2020 06:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Timothy Collinson (11 Oct 2020 12:49 UTC)

Re: [TML] refuelling... not at a gas giant Kelly St. Clair 11 Oct 2020 07:15 UTC

On 10/11/2020 12:10 AM, Rupert Boleyn wrote:

> One tonne of liquid hydrogen takes up forteen cubic metres of volume.
> Nine tonnes of water include one tonne of hydrogen, and has a volume of
> nine cubic metres. You get about 1.55 times as much hydrogen into the
> same volume, but the mass per quantity of hydrogen is nine times as
> great. In CT, MgT and a number of other rule sets spaceships care about
> volume, not mass, so water is useful if the referee is willing to go
> with it. The downside is that it's very definitely unrefined fuel, even
> if the ref is generous (I simply disallow using water as jump fuel), and
> carrying it and then refining it requires a refinery/purifier, time, and
> a tank to hold the water as well as one to hold fuel.

On the gripping hand, water is /much/ easier to handle than lHyd, as it
can quite literally be stored at room temperature, is not explosive when
allowed to warm up and mix with air, etc etc.

--
---------------
Kelly St. Clair
xxxxxx@efn.org