Question for the audience Charles McKnight (07 Nov 2021 18:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Timothy Collinson (07 Nov 2021 21:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience James Catchpole (07 Nov 2021 22:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Charles McKnight (07 Nov 2021 22:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Charles McKnight (07 Nov 2021 22:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Jeff Zeitlin (07 Nov 2021 23:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Rupert Boleyn (08 Nov 2021 00:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Charles McKnight (08 Nov 2021 00:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Alex Goodwin (08 Nov 2021 05:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Phil Pugliese (08 Nov 2021 05:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Phil Pugliese (08 Nov 2021 04:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Rupert Boleyn (08 Nov 2021 04:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Phil Pugliese (08 Nov 2021 05:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Rupert Boleyn (08 Nov 2021 08:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Chuck McKnight (08 Nov 2021 14:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Phil Pugliese (08 Nov 2021 18:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Graham Donald (08 Nov 2021 23:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Phil Pugliese (09 Nov 2021 00:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Zane Healy (09 Nov 2021 02:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Graham Donald (09 Nov 2021 05:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Zane Healy (09 Nov 2021 23:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Phil Pugliese (09 Nov 2021 19:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Zane Healy (10 Nov 2021 02:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Ingo Siekmann (10 Nov 2021 18:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Question for the audience Evyn MacDude (08 Nov 2021 17:31 UTC)

Re: [TML] Question for the audience Charles McKnight 08 Nov 2021 00:01 UTC

At the library where I was bringing automation, we had to accommodate both because the library in question was in the process of migrating from the Dewey Decimal System to the Library of Congress system.

ObTrav: Issues that can arise documentation is classified by one culture’s system.

> On Nov 7, 2021, at 3:54 PM, Jeff Zeitlin - editor at freelancetraveller.com (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 21:57:06 +0000, Timothy Collinson - timothy.collinson at
> port.ac.uk (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote to Freelance
> Traveller:
>
>> Imagine the Dewey Decimal System with only the 100s level categories.
>
> Just a random side comment - and this is NOT my American parochialism
> coming out - but the Dewey system quite frankly stinks (I wanted to use a
> stronger word); the Library of Congress system makes far more sense.
>
> ®Traveller is a registered trademark of
> Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2020. Use of
> the trademark in this notice and in the
> referenced materials is not intended to
> infringe or devalue the trademark.
>
> --
> Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
> Freelance Traveller
>    The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
> xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
> http://www.freelancetraveller.com
>
> Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
> enterprises for hosting services:
>
> onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)
> The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)
> -----
> The Traveller Mailing List
> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
> To unsubscribe from this list please go to
> http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=wBKh4aF9DMEWDxliNXwnGhxp3kljTtM8