[TML] Colds & Flus Jim Vassilakos (09 Feb 2022 04:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Thomas Jones-Low (09 Feb 2022 23:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Alex Goodwin (10 Feb 2022 03:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Timothy Collinson (10 Feb 2022 07:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Alex Goodwin (10 Feb 2022 09:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Jeffrey Schwartz (11 Feb 2022 01:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Alex Goodwin (11 Feb 2022 14:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Jeffrey Schwartz (11 Feb 2022 16:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Alex Goodwin (11 Feb 2022 16:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Timothy Collinson (11 Feb 2022 20:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Bruce Johnson (14 Feb 2022 17:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Timothy Collinson (14 Feb 2022 21:16 UTC)
Nanovirals and senolysis? Was Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Alex Goodwin (18 Feb 2022 18:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Phil Pugliese (23 Feb 2022 07:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Alex Goodwin (24 Feb 2022 16:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Phil Pugliese (22 Mar 2022 21:29 UTC)
Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Alex Goodwin (23 Mar 2022 12:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Phil Pugliese (13 Apr 2022 22:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Alex Goodwin (14 Apr 2022 16:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Rupert Boleyn (15 Apr 2022 00:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Phil Pugliese (15 Apr 2022 02:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Bruce Johnson (15 Apr 2022 18:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Phil Pugliese (15 Apr 2022 18:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Rupert Boleyn (16 Apr 2022 02:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Phil Pugliese (16 Apr 2022 16:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Alex Goodwin (16 Apr 2022 16:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Phil Pugliese (16 Apr 2022 19:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Rupert Boleyn (16 Apr 2022 23:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Operation Peaceful Hands (was re: Colds & Flus) Phil Pugliese (16 Apr 2022 23:59 UTC)

Re: [TML] Colds & Flus Alex Goodwin 10 Feb 2022 09:02 UTC

On 10/2/22 17:40, Timothy Collinson - timothy.collinson at port.ac.uk
(via tml list) wrote:
> <snip>
>
>
>     Well, firstly, my answer depends on _which_ MTU you're talking about.
>
>     Naturallyverse - GT , c 1130s/1140s Imperial, so Imperium Eternal
>     (I think).
>
>     The broad-spectrum panimmunity gubbins that Collision mentioned are
>     cheap and widely available, thanks to
>
>
>
> Ummm, kind though it is of you to credit me with knowing anything
> about the subject (or even about the GURPS reference which I'd long
> since forgotten about) (I really must sit down and read all the GURPS
> books again), it was Thomas who mentioned this.

You still mentioned it in this particular thread, thus the credit.

G3: Space mentions three differing grades of panimmunity (TLs are G3
TLs, and dice rolls are 3d6 equal to or below target - average HT of Joe
Shmuckatelli is 10):

TL9 - +3 to HT rolls to resist disease (TTL9) - Joe would be rolling 13
or under.

TL10 - +8 to HT rolls to resist disease (TTL12) - Joe would be rolling
16 or under (since 17 is always a failure in GURPS, and 18 is always a
critfail)

TL12 - Immunity To Disease, The Advantage (TTL15) - Joe would be
pointing and laughing at disease(s) in question.

G4 Basic Set: Characters has the same bonii listed.

I wonder at what TTL does the panimmunity treatment become outright blue
goo (eg, wet nanomachines) that goes into the pink goo? (HUMENS! And
Henry Freeman...)

>
> In my ignorance this would be my take.  Yes, probably by then the
> things we know now would be protected against or have been eradicated
> (smallpox?).  But there would be some 57th century equivalent doing
> something similar. Because I can't invent/imagine it and would have
> difficulty in any case describing it to players, I couch it in terms
> of something that's familiar to us all now.
>
> A bit like I might use a language pun knowing full well that "English"
> isn't what's used then but the *equivalent* is.  (For very loose
> definitions of equivalent.)
>
> tc

If stupid, but works, is it stupid?

Alex