Back to our 'big ship' discussion
Bruce Johnson
(21 Oct 2014 00:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion
Greg Caires
(21 Oct 2014 02:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion
Craig Berry
(21 Oct 2014 02:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion
Evyn MacDude
(21 Oct 2014 03:18 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 08:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Grimmund (21 Oct 2014 12:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion
Phil Pugliese
(21 Oct 2014 15:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Grimmund 21 Oct 2014 12:40 UTC
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:55 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote: > Remember > they will be on J3+ routes only, as there are only a few > ports in the world that can support Triple > E's (18 all told half in > asia the other > half in Europe) > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > So they can't come to North America at all! Oh, they could visit. They'd have trouble loading and unloading directly; have to re-handle a lot of containers. Hmmm. Adventure seed.... Dan -- "Any sufficiently advanced parody is indistinguishable from a genuine kook." -Alan Morgan