Back to our 'big ship' discussion Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 00:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Greg Caires (21 Oct 2014 02:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Craig Berry (21 Oct 2014 02:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Evyn MacDude (21 Oct 2014 03:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 08:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Grimmund (21 Oct 2014 12:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 15:15 UTC)

Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion Phil Pugliese 21 Oct 2014 15:14 UTC

--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 10/21/14, Grimmund <grimmund@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML] Back to our 'big ship' discussion
 To: tml@simplelists.com
 Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2014, 5:40 AM

 On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at
 3:55 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list)
 <nobody@simplelists.com>
 wrote:
 >  Remember
 >  they will be on J3+ routes only, as
 there are only a few
 >  ports in the
 world that can support Triple
 >  E's
 (18 all told half in
 >  asia the
 other
 >  half in Europe)
 >
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 >
 > So they can't
 come to North America at all!

 Oh, they could visit.  They'd have trouble
 loading and unloading
 directly; have to
 re-handle a lot of containers.

 Dan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So what's the largest size that the USA & Canada can handle?
(E or Double E?)
How does those sizes compare?
What about Latin America or Africa or Australia?
Surely Australia must be at least equal to NAmerica?

===================================================