Ping... Phil Pugliese (17 Oct 2014 14:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Andrew Long (17 Oct 2014 14:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Richard Aiken (18 Oct 2014 11:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Kelly St. Clair (18 Oct 2014 12:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Andrew Long (18 Oct 2014 16:15 UTC)
Fusion by 2025? Kurt Feltenberger (18 Oct 2014 17:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Kelly St. Clair (18 Oct 2014 17:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (19 Oct 2014 00:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Craig Berry (19 Oct 2014 03:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ian Whitchurch (19 Oct 2014 04:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Craig Berry (19 Oct 2014 04:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Richard Aiken (20 Oct 2014 00:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (20 Oct 2014 02:25 UTC)
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ewan Quibell (20 Oct 2014 09:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (20 Oct 2014 16:46 UTC)
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Anthony Jackson (20 Oct 2014 17:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (21 Oct 2014 21:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (19 Oct 2014 16:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (21 Oct 2014 21:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 21:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (21 Oct 2014 22:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ian Whitchurch (21 Oct 2014 23:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (21 Oct 2014 23:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ian Whitchurch (22 Oct 2014 00:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (22 Oct 2014 07:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Tim (21 Oct 2014 04:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ian Whitchurch (21 Oct 2014 04:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 08:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 16:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 09:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 16:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 17:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 17:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? David Shaw (21 Oct 2014 18:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 18:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 18:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Evyn MacDude (21 Oct 2014 21:02 UTC)
Fringe Politics in the 3I; was Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (21 Oct 2014 21:45 UTC)
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Anthony Jackson (21 Oct 2014 20:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (21 Oct 2014 21:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Evyn MacDude (21 Oct 2014 21:13 UTC)
RE: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Anthony Jackson (21 Oct 2014 21:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Edward Swatschek (22 Oct 2014 05:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Kenneth Barns (22 Oct 2014 07:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Greg Chalik (22 Oct 2014 07:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (22 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (22 Oct 2014 17:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Evyn MacDude (21 Oct 2014 21:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Colin Paddock (23 Oct 2014 01:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (23 Oct 2014 16:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? David Shaw (23 Oct 2014 17:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson (23 Oct 2014 17:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Colin Paddock (05 Nov 2014 22:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 00:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Ian Whitchurch (05 Nov 2014 22:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 00:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Kelly St. Clair (06 Nov 2014 01:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Phil Pugliese (06 Nov 2014 04:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Tim (06 Nov 2014 05:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Phil Pugliese (18 Oct 2014 17:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Richard Aiken (20 Oct 2014 00:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Phil Pugliese (20 Oct 2014 16:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Ping... Kurt Feltenberger (20 Oct 2014 16:57 UTC)

Re: [TML] Fusion by 2025? Bruce Johnson 21 Oct 2014 16:18 UTC

On Oct 21, 2014, at 2:02 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote:

>
> A lot of people really are really, really scared of *anything* that's 'nuclear'…

yeah, but those haven’t been the people in charge of allocating this funding. Those people HAVE done a good job blaming it all on the hippies.

The reason nuclear power isn’t a big thing right now has far, far less to do with the dirty smelly anti-nuke hippies than the guys in the bank offices with the green visors.

Fission plants are a hella lot more expensive to build, run, maintain and (eventually) decommission than they were sold as.

Believe me, if nuclear power plants were profitable, all the DSANH’s in the world would have not been enough to stop the profit machines.

You’ll notice they didn’t really slow down building little ones for submarines. That’s because in that context, nuclear power made economic sense. The reason we only built one nuke-powered carrier was because it’s cheaper to build, use and  maintain conventional ones not because we thought that nukes were evil.

--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs