FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller (15 Nov 2015 02:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers tmr0195@xxxxxx (15 Nov 2015 15:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Tim (15 Nov 2015 23:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers tmr0195@xxxxxx (16 Nov 2015 02:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers tmr0195@xxxxxx (16 Nov 2015 03:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller (21 Nov 2015 02:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers William Ewing (16 Nov 2015 00:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller (21 Nov 2015 02:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers William Ewing (21 Nov 2015 07:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller (21 Nov 2015 19:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers William Ewing (21 Nov 2015 23:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller (21 Nov 2015 02:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Kurt Feltenberger (16 Nov 2015 02:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller (21 Nov 2015 02:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller (21 Nov 2015 05:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers tmr0195@xxxxxx (21 Nov 2015 13:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Jim Vassilakos (21 Nov 2015 20:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller (21 Nov 2015 23:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller (21 Nov 2015 23:45 UTC)

Re: [TML] FOR PEER REVIEW: Dreamwalkers Freelance Traveller 21 Nov 2015 02:15 UTC

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 15:33:44 +0000 (UTC), tmr0195@comcast.net wrote:

>First, thank you for publishing Free Lance Traveller a very good product with
>lots of good things for me to use or a more frequent occurrence is to be on
>the receiving end.

Thank _you_. Feedback from the readers is the only "pay" I get for doing
this. It's nice to hear comments that suggets that there's a possibility
that I just might have accidentally done something that could be
interpreted as 'right'. :)
 

>Under "What Is Dream Walking?"
> 
>1. The second sentence does not make sense to as written:
> 
>"Lucid dreaming involves the awareness of the dreamer that
>s/he is dreaming, and can lead to control over the dream, with
>training and practice."
> 
>Hopefully my edit of the sentence below is what the sentence was
>met to indicate:
> 
>"Lucid dreaming involves the awareness of the dreamer that
>s/he is dreaming, and can learn to have  control over the dream, with
>training and a lot of  practice."

I admit that my original sentence leaves something to be desired; it
clearly didn't produce the clarity that I might wish. The problem with
your suggested revision is that you've added confusion of antecedents to
the inclarity (is that a word? It is now!) that I created. The subject
of my sentence is 'lucid dreaming', and the sentence could be broken up
as

   Lucid dreaming involves the awareness of the dreamer that s/he is
   dreaming.

   Lucid dreaming can lead to control over the dream, with training and
   practice.

Your version breaks up as

   Lucid dreaming involves awareness of the dreamer that s/he is
   dreaming.

   S/he [the dreamer] can learn to have control over the dream, with
   training and lots of practice.

Notice how the subject changes from the first sentence to the second. In
a compound sentence (which is what the original is), you can't change
the subject between clauses; you must stick with a single subject.
 
>2. Maximum range:
> 
>As indicated earlier I am a bit light on game mechanics and to make
>matters worse I don't have access to my Traveller books so my comment
>of the range may be out to lunch.
> 
>My vague memory on Psionics is that the range for the various where
>a lot shorter than 15,000 km.

I didn't actually check range rules, but I thought I remembered seeing a
list of ranges that ...ummm, ranged... from personal/contact to
interstellar. My intents is to restrict dreamwalking to _at_most_
planetary range - that is, the dreamwalker and the dreamer pretty much
have to be on the same world (though certain close orbits would also be
more-or-less acceptable). If the max range for psionics, and
specifically for telepathy, are lower, that limit should govern. I'll
put that into the next draft.
 
>Under "What Can Dream Walkers Do?"
> 
>In the section of "What Is Dream Walking?" four types are identified the
>first sentence of "What Can Dream Walkers Do?"
> 
>"There are several types of dreamwalkers, divided by their capability to
>perceive or interact with dreams."
> 
>I expected the "several types" to expand the four core types which I
>do not feel occurred, of course I may have missed them.

No, the four types are all there are. When I started writing it, I only
had two types - essentially, what became the Observer and the Bender. As
I was scribbling, that expanded to three, and then four. Since I had to
go back and change 'two' to 'three', and then came up with the fourth, I
decided to just say 'several' to keep my south end while facing north
covered against any further refinement.
 
>Under Task Summary:
> 
>The first paragraph provides guidance for Observers, Visitors, and
>Weavers but does not mention Benders.

The first task summary, Initiating a dream walk, applies to _all_
dreamwalkers. However, none of the other tasks apply to Observers or
Visitors (hence the sentence about 'This is the _only_ task that applies
to...), the +2 for sleeping also applies to _all_ dreamwalkers, but the
-3 DM only applies to Weavers. I'll reorganize that paragraph; it's not
well-written.

--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
    The Electronic Fan-Supported
    Traveller® Fanzine and Resource

xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
http://www.freelancetraveller.com
http://freelancetraveller.downport.com/

®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2014. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.

Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:

CyberNET Web Hosting (http://www.cyberwebhosting.net)
The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)