test shadowgard.com
shadow@xxxxxx
(29 Apr 2016 18:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(29 Apr 2016 21:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com
Richard Aiken
(29 Apr 2016 22:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com
shadow@xxxxxx
(30 Apr 2016 15:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com
Bruce Johnson
(30 Apr 2016 21:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com
Freelance Traveller
(29 Apr 2016 23:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2016 15:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx 30 Apr 2016 15:11 UTC
On 29 Apr 2016 at 19:07, Freelance Traveller wrote: > On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:43:31 -0700, you wrote to Freelance Traveller: > > >Ok, I'm sending *two* test messages. This one is from my > >shadowgard.com address. I'm also sending one from gmail. > > > >If you don't see both messages, let me know which one you didn't see. > > > >Likewise if one wound up in your spam folder. > > I got both, at both a Yahoo! address and at freelancetraveller.com. I > have spam-foldering at all of my mail provides turned off, so there's no > way of knowing whether either would have been spam-foldered, but I > checked copies sent to both my Yahoo! address and my > freelancetraveller.com address, and Agent's own spam-checking would not > have marked any of them as spam, even if I didn't have rules that say > "put them here". The ending up in a spam folder isn't due to failing spam tests. It's due to failing *dmarc* tests and folowing the published policy on shadowgard.com which is "quarantine". -- Leonard Erickson (aka shadow) shadow at shadowgard dot com