test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2016 18:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com tmr0195@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2016 21:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com Richard Aiken (29 Apr 2016 22:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2016 15:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com Bruce Johnson (30 Apr 2016 21:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com Freelance Traveller (29 Apr 2016 23:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2016 15:12 UTC)

Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx 30 Apr 2016 15:11 UTC

On 29 Apr 2016 at 19:07, Freelance Traveller wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:43:31 -0700, you wrote to Freelance Traveller:
>
> >Ok, I'm sending *two* test messages. This one is from my
> >shadowgard.com address. I'm also sending one from gmail.
> >
> >If you don't see both messages, let me know which one you didn't see.
> >
> >Likewise if one wound up in your spam folder.
>
> I got both, at both a Yahoo! address and at freelancetraveller.com. I
> have spam-foldering at all of my mail provides turned off, so there's no
> way of knowing whether either would have been spam-foldered, but I
> checked copies sent to both my Yahoo! address and my
> freelancetraveller.com address, and Agent's own spam-checking would not
> have marked any of them as spam, even if I didn't have rules that say
> "put them here".

The ending up in a spam folder isn't due to failing spam tests. It's
due to failing *dmarc* tests and folowing the published policy on
shadowgard.com which is "quarantine".

--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com