test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2016 18:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com tmr0195@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2016 21:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com Richard Aiken (29 Apr 2016 22:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2016 15:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com Bruce Johnson (30 Apr 2016 21:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com Freelance Traveller (29 Apr 2016 23:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com shadow@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2016 15:12 UTC)

Re: [TML] test shadowgard.com Bruce Johnson 30 Apr 2016 21:16 UTC

> On Apr 29, 2016, at 3:14 PM, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I got a big yellow box (from Google?) asking me the (rhetorical?) question, "Why is this message in spam?" then answering itself with, "It comes from shadowgard.com but fails shadowgard.com's tests." . . . or words to this effect (I'm on my phone and don't know how to cut and paste with it).

Mail from this list is checked by Google for DMARC validation: <https://dmarc.org>:

from the headers of a gmail message:

Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@simplelists.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@shadowgard.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of owner-tml+bruce.desertrat=xxxxxx@simplelists.com designates 89.16.184.173 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=owner-tml+bruce.desertrat=xxxxxx@simplelists.com; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=shadowgard.com

At this point it’s either something odd with shadowgard.com’s DKIM signature, or we’ll have to do to Leonard’s email what we’re doing to Phil’s, rewrite the from address...

Gmail has different DKIM signature notations. Leonard, I’ll send you what I find off list.

--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs