Nuclear Dampers Kurt Feltenberger (09 Dec 2017 02:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Dampers
Rupert Boleyn
(09 Dec 2017 03:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Dampers
Jeffrey Schwartz
(10 Dec 2017 01:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Dampers
Rupert Boleyn
(10 Dec 2017 02:15 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] NuclearDampers
Rob O'Connor
(10 Dec 2017 02:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Dampers
Rob O'Connor
(10 Dec 2017 03:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Nuclear Dampers
Kurt Feltenberger
(10 Dec 2017 03:22 UTC)
|
Nuclear Dampers Kurt Feltenberger 09 Dec 2017 02:58 UTC
I've been contemplating a scenario where nuclear dampers are used and had some questions regarding their deployment and effects. 1. When defending against nuclear missiles, what exactly happens to the nuclear warhead that the damper targets? Does the warhead still detonate but due to the damper field fail to reach critical mass and thus produce a nuclear explosion? (which sort of begs the question about how useful tossing nuclear bombs at each other in space really is...) 2. In one of the various products (or maybe a periodical article from decades back), there was a comment that dampers were used to clean up after nuclear accidents and nuclear attacks. Again, how would this work? It would seem like this is something akin to Dr. Feelgood's Fallout and Half-Live accelerator tonic in that it somehow accelerates decay to an absurd speed. Thanks! -- Kurt Feltenberger xxxxxx@thepaw.org/xxxxxx@yahoo.com “Before today, I was scared to live, after today, I'm scared I'm not living enough." - Me