Where the UPP fails me... kaladorn@xxxxxx (28 Apr 2020 11:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Jeff Zeitlin (28 Apr 2020 12:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Timothy Collinson (28 Apr 2020 13:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Rupert Boleyn (28 Apr 2020 13:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Jeff Zeitlin (28 Apr 2020 14:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... kaladorn@xxxxxx (28 Apr 2020 22:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Kenneth Barns (28 Apr 2020 22:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Graham Donald (29 Apr 2020 01:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... kaladorn@xxxxxx (29 Apr 2020 01:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Bruce Johnson (29 Apr 2020 15:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Vareck Bostrom (29 Apr 2020 22:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... kaladorn@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2020 08:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Vareck Bostrom (30 Apr 2020 08:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... kaladorn@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2020 14:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Phil Pugliese (30 Apr 2020 15:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Vareck Bostrom (30 Apr 2020 16:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... kaladorn@xxxxxx (30 Apr 2020 19:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Vareck Bostrom (30 Apr 2020 21:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... kaladorn@xxxxxx (01 May 2020 17:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Phil Pugliese (30 Apr 2020 21:25 UTC)
RE: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Steve Simenic (01 May 2020 02:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Thomas RUX (30 Apr 2020 20:29 UTC)
Klemperer Rosettes Jonathan Clark (01 May 2020 17:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Klemperer Rosettes Vareck Bostrom (01 May 2020 18:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Klemperer Rosettes Kelly St. Clair (01 May 2020 23:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Klemperer Rosettes Kelly St. Clair (01 May 2020 23:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] KlempererRosettes Jonathan Clark (02 May 2020 01:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Klemperer Rosettes Jonathan Clark (02 May 2020 01:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Klemperer Rosettes Vareck Bostrom (02 May 2020 02:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Kenneth Barns (29 Apr 2020 02:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Phil Pugliese (28 Apr 2020 19:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Rupert Boleyn (28 Apr 2020 19:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Thomas RUX (28 Apr 2020 19:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Rupert Boleyn (28 Apr 2020 20:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Thomas RUX (29 Apr 2020 02:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Phil Pugliese (29 Apr 2020 19:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Thomas Jones-Low (29 Apr 2020 20:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... Phil Pugliese (30 Apr 2020 15:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] "That's no moon, it's a . . ." Jonathan Clark (01 May 2020 18:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] "That's no moon, it's a . . ." Phil Pugliese (01 May 2020 20:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] "That's no moon, it's a . . ." (was: Where the UPP fails me...) Jeff Zeitlin (30 Apr 2020 14:32 UTC)

Re: [TML] "That's no moon, it's a . . ." (was: Where the UPP fails me...) Jeff Zeitlin 30 Apr 2020 14:32 UTC

On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 04:50:30 -0400, xxxxxx@gmail.com wrote to Freelance
Traveller:

>Well, let's think what we'd do for a large-city sized station rotating
>around a sun without a planet as far as UPP goes.
>
>Port: A - if you built an amazing self sufficient solar-circling city, you
>must have a big port.

Don't confuse _Size_ with _Capability_ - Traveller starport codes in the
UWP are more aligned with capability than size. The Port of New York (real
world) can't build or do significant repair on ships berthed there; by
Traveller standards, it'd be Class C because of that lack - even though it
might offer everything else that a Class A port could offer. I'd say that
it's guaranteed to be Class C Plus, but not necessarily B or A.

>Government and Law can be rolled so could be anything.

Some limitations on Government; I'd expect that 0 (anarchy) or 7
(balkanization) would not be sensible options, and if I rolled either of
these I'd insist on rerolling.

Law would be relatively high, in any case, because you don't want random
idiocy to cause damage to e.g., life support. Probably not less than 6
generally, and weapons would probably be higher - likely all projectile
weapons prohibited, and blades and clubs seriously restricted.

®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2020. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.

--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
    The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
http://www.freelancetraveller.com

Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:

onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)
The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)