What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Postmark
(20 Feb 2022 22:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Jeff Zeitlin
(21 Feb 2022 00:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Jeff Rowse
(21 Feb 2022 12:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Timothy Collinson
(21 Feb 2022 19:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
James Davies
(21 Feb 2022 19:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Alex Goodwin (22 Feb 2022 14:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Jeff Zeitlin
(24 Feb 2022 00:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Jeff Rowse
(24 Feb 2022 12:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Alex Goodwin
(24 Feb 2022 14:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Jeff Rowse
(03 Mar 2022 12:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Alex Goodwin
(03 Mar 2022 16:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Alex Goodwin 22 Feb 2022 14:06 UTC
On 22/2/22 05:53, James Davies - jesdavies at hotmail.com (via tml list) wrote: > > I wondered if someone else might be interested in a list of things > the governments might not want ethical merchants freely transporting > between places. > > A merchant doesn't have to be unethical for a product to be put to an > unethical use. Quite a few adventure seeds along those lines! > Dual-use technologies, anyone? Gets even more interesting if not all of those governments agree on what is on the "nice" list. Or if, Government A encourages, by policy or by official neglect, shipping stuff to B's turf that is definitely on B's "not-nice" list.