What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Postmark
(20 Feb 2022 22:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Jeff Zeitlin
(21 Feb 2022 00:12 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Jeff Rowse
(21 Feb 2022 12:41 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Timothy Collinson
(21 Feb 2022 19:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
James Davies
(21 Feb 2022 19:53 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Alex Goodwin
(22 Feb 2022 14:06 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Jeff Zeitlin (24 Feb 2022 00:59 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Jeff Rowse
(24 Feb 2022 12:27 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Alex Goodwin
(24 Feb 2022 14:54 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Jeff Rowse
(03 Mar 2022 12:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo
Alex Goodwin
(03 Mar 2022 16:23 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] What is covered by a UK arms embargo Jeff Zeitlin 24 Feb 2022 00:59 UTC
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:06:00 +1000, Alex Goodwin <xxxxxx@multitel.com.au> wrote: >Dual-use technologies, anyone? > > >Gets even more interesting if not all of those governments agree on what >is on the "nice" list. > >Or if, Government A encourages, by policy or by official neglect, >shipping stuff to B's turf that is definitely on B's "not-nice" list. Another fun situation arises where for domestic political reasons you can't sell [directly] to Starbellisneechia, but for astropolitical reasons it's better if Starbellisneechia has _your_ technology rather than Whovillia's - so you sell to Grinchistan and "forget" to include the no-transfer clauses in the contracts, knowing full well that Grinchistan and Starbellisneechia have a close technology-sharing agreement...