TL10 Spee Class 30,000 ton Pocket Battleship ewan@xxxxxx (25 Feb 2023 14:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] TL10 Spee Class 30,000 ton Pocket Battleship Rupert Boleyn (25 Feb 2023 23:56 UTC)
RE: [TML] TL10 Spee Class 30,000 ton Pocket Battleship ewan@xxxxxx (05 Mar 2023 12:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] TL10 Spee Class 30,000 ton Pocket Battleship Jeff Zeitlin (05 Mar 2023 20:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] TL10 Spee Class 30,000 ton Pocket Battleship Rupert Boleyn (05 Mar 2023 22:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] TL10 Spee Class 30,000 ton Pocket Battleship Rupert Boleyn (05 Mar 2023 22:45 UTC)

Re: [TML] TL10 Spee Class 30,000 ton Pocket Battleship Rupert Boleyn 25 Feb 2023 23:56 UTC


On 26Feb2023 0338, ewan at quibell.org.uk (via tml list) wrote:
> And this is the Robust Class with a Jump drive attached to it.
>
> 30,000 tons for a jump capable battle ship seems a bit small, but it is what
> it is .
>
> I'm might look at more armour, but I'm not sure if it's worth it . comments
> welcome

As I recall, back in the days of the LLBs and High Guard, the goal was
to keep 'small' combatants under 20 KTons, because that was one of the
breakpoints for hit chance (the next being under 75 KTons). So by that
measure it's in the low end of its size range. By another it needs to
lose some weight.

It easily passes the most important HG test though - it's big enough no
spinal weapon of its TL can get auto-crits on it.

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>